|
Soviets
Mar 11, 2010 15:20:05 GMT -5
Post by bob on Mar 11, 2010 15:20:05 GMT -5
I was looking at Russian stuff today, and think they look like the most expensive army to build.
Their vehicles are decent stat-wise, cheap point-wise, expensive $-wise.
Infantry is the same, they come in handfuls, but cost a lot ($20 for a platoon, I made a list that had 10 platoons PLUS tank support!!)
Anyone looking at building a Soviet force?
|
|
|
Soviets
Mar 13, 2010 0:17:03 GMT -5
Post by apothecarybob on Mar 13, 2010 0:17:03 GMT -5
I like how this game can always come down to the historical aspect of the game. From what I remember, the Soviets were the first to use sloped army correct? Me just thinking, that would allow the soviets to use less material per tank, and produce them faster/cheaper. So droves of tanks is a Soviet thing. Same with hordes of infantry with 5 guns for every 10 guys (well...a few battles there where a large shortage of guns). How true any of this is, I'm not sure right now, too tired to care Game wise, I like the US better. Mainly because I love the Sherman tank, and Patton was, in my opinion, the greatest American general of all time. I think Dante said he wanted to do a Soviet army...could be wrong
|
|
|
Soviets
Mar 13, 2010 7:19:43 GMT -5
Post by hivemindbob on Mar 13, 2010 7:19:43 GMT -5
Ahh I can see it now. Referencing Call Of Duty 2, I can see the options now for soviet troops: For 5 points troops can take grenades for 2 points troops can take potatoes because real grenades are too expensive
|
|
|
Soviets
Mar 16, 2010 16:35:24 GMT -5
Post by shasoevan on Mar 16, 2010 16:35:24 GMT -5
They are very cool, with lots of tanks to choose from. and the do have shermans a bob.
|
|